In a recent incident highlighting the complexities of U.S. immigration enforcement, a Wisconsin man remains steadfast in his support for President Trump despite the detention of his Peruvian wife by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) upon their return from a honeymoon.
The episode underscores the challenges faced by individuals navigating the immigration system and the personal ramifications of stringent enforcement policies.

Bradley Bartell, a 40-year-old resident of Wisconsin Dells, and his wife, Sylvia Camilla Muñoz-Lira, 26, were returning from a belated honeymoon in Puerto Rico on February 15 when their journey took an unexpected turn. At Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport in San Juan, ICE agents detained Muñoz-Lira due to her overstayed J-1 visa. She is currently held at Richwood Correctional Center in Louisiana, awaiting a court date.
Trending: Trump DOJ Targets Obama Judge
Bartell expressed shock and uncertainty following his wife’s detention, stating it felt like “a slap in the face.” The couple had been unaware that traveling to a U.S. territory could result in such consequences, especially with Muñoz-Lira’s pending application for permanent residency.
Despite the ordeal, Bartell maintains his support for President Trump. He acknowledges the necessity of enforcing immigration laws but advocates for a more efficient system, particularly for individuals like his wife who lack a criminal history. Bartell’s stance reflects a belief in upholding the rule of law while seeking reforms to address bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Muñoz-Lira’s immigration journey began in 2019 when she arrived in the U.S. on a work-study program. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted her plans to return to Peru, leading to an overstay of her visa. During this period, she met Bartell, and the couple married in May 2024. They had initiated the process to adjust her immigration status, with her application under review by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services at the time of her detention.
The couple’s situation has garnered public attention, leading Bartell to establish a GoFundMe campaign to cover legal expenses and a potential bond, which could amount to $15,000. He expressed concern over the prolonged detention of individuals without criminal records, emphasizing the financial burden on taxpayers and the emotional toll on families.
Bartell’s experience sheds light on the broader implications of current immigration policies. While supporting the administration’s commitment to national security, he questions the efficiency of detaining individuals like his wife, who have no criminal background and are actively seeking legal residency. This perspective aligns with a conservative viewpoint that advocates for law enforcement balanced with procedural reforms to enhance system efficiency.
The case also highlights the challenges faced by mixed-status families in the U.S. Bartell’s 12-year-old son has formed a close bond with Muñoz-Lira, adding a layer of complexity to the family’s predicament. The potential separation poses emotional and developmental concerns for the child, reflecting the human aspect of immigration enforcement.
Bartell’s unwavering support for President Trump, despite personal adversity, underscores a commitment to conservative principles. He differentiates between the enforcement of immigration laws and the need for systemic improvements, advocating for reforms that expedite the adjudication process for detainees without criminal records.
The incident has sparked discussions about the scope and implementation of immigration policies. Bartell initially believed that enforcement efforts would focus on individuals with criminal histories or those who entered the country illegally. The detention of his wife, who was in the process of legalizing her status, challenges this assumption and calls for a reevaluation of enforcement priorities.
Legal experts note that overstaying a visa is a civil violation, distinct from criminal activity. The current administration’s policies, however, have broadened the criteria for detention and deportation, encompassing individuals without criminal records. This approach aims to uphold the integrity of immigration laws but has led to debates about proportionality and resource allocation.
Bartell’s situation illustrates the need for a balanced approach to immigration enforcement—one that maintains national security while ensuring fair and efficient processes for those seeking legal residency. His advocacy for system reforms reflects a conservative perspective that values law and order alongside compassionate consideration of individual circumstances.
As Muñoz-Lira awaits her court date, the family remains hopeful for a favorable outcome. Bartell’s experience serves as a poignant reminder of the personal stories intertwined with national policy decisions, emphasizing the importance of nuanced approaches to complex issues like immigration.
The case continues to unfold, with legal proceedings pending and public interest growing. It highlights the intersection of personal lives and political policies, prompting ongoing discussions about the future of immigration enforcement in the United States.
According to Newsweek, Bartell admitted that he might have to move to Peru if his wife is deported. Yet he still doesn’t regret supporting the one man in Washington who’s actually trying to fix the mess.
A GoFundMe page has been created to help cover legal expenses.